It’s Time for Cities to Reject the Welfare Mentality :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Its Time for Cities to Reject the Welfare brainAll over the nation-from New York to Los Angeles, from San Diego to Milwaukee-cities are on the rebound. Each self- do city has accomplished its renaissance in its deliver particular charge, with its own special twist. But if you look across the spectrum of flourishing cities, you can spot a clear set of principles that leads to urban health. To start with, there is a total rejection of the old municipal benefit state ideology, whose decades of failed policies led the nations cities to the brink. urban government, that idea went, was above all to achieve social justice and the excite of the poor. It seemed to make sense Cities always had big concentrations both of poor bulk to help and of wealth to tax. So cities piled on welfare benefits and social services, created grand bureaucracies to administer them, and taxed heavily to fund them. But things didnt work out as expected. With the information revolution, all those companies whose great skyscrapers made them look eternally grow there no longer had to be in the cities to be in effect(p) their suppliers, customers, or bankers. And global competition required them to get efficient and put down costs. No to a greater extent could they justify paying high corpo site income taxes, commercial-grade rent taxes, inflated utility taxes. So the number of Fortune calciferol companies headquartered in New York fell from 140 in 1947 to 31 now. And the new, little businesses that select generated all of the new jobs of the past decade or more never started up in many of the old cities. Result A city like New York has created non one single gain new job since World War II. Worse, the costly municipal welfare state turned out not to work. All the indicators are worse, not better, than when the whole rescue effort began. The inner city illegitimacy rate is way up, the urban high school graduation rate way down. The poverty rate hasnt dropped and, until the new -paradigm reforms, the welfare dependency rate had soared. All these billions of dollars made things worse, because, we learned, if communities dont make their citizens personally responsible for themselves and their families, but instead tell them theyre victims, they give become dependent and demoralized. If the welfare state tells people that its fine to have illegitimate children, that poverty excuses crime, that welfare payments are appropriate reparations for historical victimization, and that work in dead-end jobs for chump change is undignified-what can possibly expiry but illegitimacy, crime, welfare dependency, and non-work?