Should Yahoo have been forced to turn over Justin Ellsworth’s email to his Parents?

In this essay, I will attempt to give way the utilitarian and deontological extols of the issue of should yokel had been forced to turn over Justin Ellsworths e-mails to his p atomic number 18nts. Individual hiding is most valuable salutary that hoi polloi possesses particularly during our time of advance technology. It is among the essential values on which our country was founded. As with all told rights, there are limitations. Technology advancement has added more challenges to exclusive seclusion. Email privacy is an issue that affects a growing number of muckle. To full appreciate the lack of privacy and security of our email messages, it is important to visualize the issues and threat that exist (Inforweblink). Many argue that a person email account contains as much as information as a person bank account if non more and it should be tempered as such. If we should treat our email accounts as our bank accounts then is it right for the royal courts to force compan ies to hand over information to third parties? Utilitarian consideration is described as the greatest good for the greatest number of people (Bentham).To determine who would gain the most from the emails, we must identify the parties involve. The parties involved are chawbacon (the email service provider), Justin and Justins elevates. With all email account, the substance abuser must sign a user concordment. In most agreement, privacy is the number one topic covered. rube user agreement states, You agree that your hick account is non-transferable and any rights to your Yahoo ID or contents indoors your account terminate upon your death. The statement was created to protect the privacy of all including the decease.Yahoo risked losing the trust of its users if they willingly gave up Justins email to his parents. According to Yahoo Information Sharing and Disclosure section of the user agreement, Yahoo does non rent, sell, or share personal information about you with other peopl e or nonaffiliated companies except to provide products or services youve requested, when we have your permission. Therefore, if Justin absent to share his information with his parents, then he would have gave them nark to his account. i should get going oh by the way i am saveing all of the e-mails that i get from everyon. They really brighten my day i love you and i will talk to you soon LOVEYOUALL LOTS JUSTIN These are contiguous to of the emails that Justin sent to his father, legerdemain Ellsworth. John will hold these words close to his heart. John pleaded with Yahoo to release the email to his family to fulfill the family wishes of reading, seeing, and knowing the materialization mans last words, pictures and approximations from the front lines of Iraq. I want to be able to remember him in his words. I know he thought he was doing what he needed to do.I want to have that for the future, John said. Its the last thing I have of my son. Where should we put the most em phasis, Justins family memory or protecting the privacy of others? Justins account not only contains emails to his parents but to other also. If Yahoo had giving up the emails willingly to Justins parents, they would be violating the Justin privacy and those who he was corresponding with. After examining apiece party involved it clearly shows that Yahoo would gain the most of the email because the privacy of all is just as important as one.Deontological considerations access a person rights and duty associated with that right. Yahoo and Justin entered into a contract erst Justin agreed to the terms and condition set forth by Yahoo in its user agreement therefore creating a contractual right. Yahoo has a contractual obligation to Justin and all e-mail subscribers to protect their confidentiality and privacy dead or alive (Jennifer Chamber/ the Detroit News). When Yahoo declined Justins parents access to his account they were fulfilling their obligation that they had with Justin.M any were quick to adjudicate Yahoo without fully examining the situation. Frank McNelis, a former Air force back officer said, Yahoo could view an exception if it wanted to in this lineament I think its outrageous, he said. Justin had a part in the contractual agreement also. Yahoo Terms of Service agreement states, You are trusty for maintaining the confidentiality of the password and account Once Justin accepted those terms, he was obligated to extend out his role in the TOS. The TOS might have played a part in Justin not giving his parents access to his account or maybe he just wanted his privacy.Looking at the deontological opinion of this situation, Yahoo was right to decline the family assess to Justin Ellsworths email account. decided who was right in the case, brought up some challenges that had to be worked through in order to make the correct moral decision. Morally it was wrong of the court to force Yahoo to give up Justins emails to his parents. Yahoo is cut bac k to protect their user privacy. The contractual right that Yahoo shared with Justin enabled them to make the moral decision.